ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Temporal-oscillatory entrainment: a multi-timescale framework for rhythmic coordination from neural to social frequencies.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The brain coordinates behavior across timescales spanning milliseconds to days through cross-frequency coupling (CFC)-the mechanism by which slow oscillations modulate the amplitude and timing of faster oscillations, creating a hierarchical temporal architecture. Existing frameworks have typically addressed oscillations within narrow frequency ranges, leaving cross-timescale coordination mechanisms underspecified. Approach: I propose a unified framework termed Temporal-Oscillatory Entrainment (TOE), which organizes entrainment phenomena (using the term in its chronobiological sense) across nine frequency ranges into three functional categories: neural (high gamma through delta), biological (behavioral through circadian), and social (weeks and longer). The framework identifies the auditory-motor system as a privileged pathway, given that CFC occurs in the auditory brainstem and rate-restricted coupling at approximately 4-5 Hz reflects an intrinsic auditory-motor rhythm. Evidence: Musical training studies demonstrate that rhythmic experience induces neuroplastic changes spanning subcortical to cortical levels, with transfer effects documented across multiple frequency bands-from millisecond-level discrimination to phrase-level processing. Beyond neural timescales, respiratory rhythms provide a well-characterized example of behavioral-frequency oscillations coupling to neural activity, while social rhythm therapy research demonstrates that stabilizing daily behavioral patterns affects circadian function and mood regulation. Musical ensemble coordination instantiates the same hierarchical nesting and phase-based coupling that characterizes neural CFC. Implications: The TOE framework generates testable predictions about bidirectional transfer effects between timescales, individual differences in entrainment capacity, and the distinct contributions of solo versus ensemble musical experience, with implications for understanding cognitive development, clinical intervention, and the neurobiological foundations of temporal coordination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.