Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42395885›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026

Long-term follow-up of patients with pulmonary hypertension after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation and atrial tachycardia.

Milan Dusik, Stepan Havranek, Zdenka Fingrova, Pavel Jansa, David Ambroz, Vladimir Dytrych, Tomas Skala, Martin Hutyra, Jan Precek, Adrian Reichenbach and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04053361 (Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation/Tachycardia in Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04053361 nacompletednot on this map

Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation/Tachycardia in Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension: a Randomised Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorGeneral University Hospital, PragueRan2018 to 2022Enrolled76ConditionsAtrial Fibrillation, Pulmonary HypertensionArmsCatheter ablation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Milan Dusik2nd Department of Medicine-Department of Cardiovascular Medicine of the 1st Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czechia.
Stepan Havranek2nd Department of Medicine-Department of Cardiovascular Medicine of the 1st Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czechia.
Zdenka Fingrova2nd Department of Medicine-Department of Cardiovascular Medicine of the 1st Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czechia.
Pavel Jansa2nd Department of Medicine-Department of Cardiovascular Medicine of the 1st Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czechia.
David Ambroz2nd Department of Medicine-Department of Cardiovascular Medicine of the 1st Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czechia.
Vladimir Dytrych2nd Department of Medicine-Department of Cardiovascular Medicine of the 1st Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czechia.
Tomas SkalaFirst Department of Internal Medicine-Cardiology, Olomouc University Hospital, Olomouc, Czechia.
Martin HutyraFirst Department of Internal Medicine-Cardiology, Olomouc University Hospital, Olomouc, Czechia.
Jan PrecekFirst Department of Internal Medicine-Cardiology, Olomouc University Hospital, Olomouc, Czechia.
Adrian ReichenbachDepartment of Cardiology, Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czechia.
Dan Wichterle2nd Department of Medicine-Department of Cardiovascular Medicine of the 1st Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czechia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The previously published randomized trial comparing an extensive (targeting both clinical arrhythmia and bi-atrial arrhythmogenic substrate) and a limited (clinical arrhythmia only) approach to catheter ablation in patients with pulmonary hypertension did not demonstrate a significant difference in atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) recurrence during the one-year follow-up. This study presents the long-term results of these patients. Methods: Participants enrolled in the randomized trial (NCT04053361) were further followed and checked for ATA recurrence and all-cause mortality. Follow-up was primarily clinically driven, as the protocol for this secondary analysis was not fully prespecified. Results: A total of 74 patients [41 males, median age 71 years (IQR: 61; 75)] were randomized to the extended ( Conclusion: Extensive catheter ablation in patients with pulmonary hypertension did not reduce ATA recurrence during the routine follow-up of more than 40 months. Cavo-tricuspid isthmus ablation appears effective in preventing recurrence of typical atrial flutter, even in this high-risk population. Given the exploratory nature of these analyses, further research is needed.

Indexed as

arrhythmiaatrial fibrillationatrial tachycardiacatheter ablationlong-term follow-uppulmonary hypertension

Identifiers

PMID42395885
PMCPMC13322793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.