ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Long-term follow-up of patients with pulmonary hypertension after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation and atrial tachycardia.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04053361 (Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation/Tachycardia in Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation/Tachycardia in Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension: a Randomised Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The previously published randomized trial comparing an extensive (targeting both clinical arrhythmia and bi-atrial arrhythmogenic substrate) and a limited (clinical arrhythmia only) approach to catheter ablation in patients with pulmonary hypertension did not demonstrate a significant difference in atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) recurrence during the one-year follow-up. This study presents the long-term results of these patients. Methods: Participants enrolled in the randomized trial (NCT04053361) were further followed and checked for ATA recurrence and all-cause mortality. Follow-up was primarily clinically driven, as the protocol for this secondary analysis was not fully prespecified. Results: A total of 74 patients [41 males, median age 71 years (IQR: 61; 75)] were randomized to the extended ( Conclusion: Extensive catheter ablation in patients with pulmonary hypertension did not reduce ATA recurrence during the routine follow-up of more than 40 months. Cavo-tricuspid isthmus ablation appears effective in preventing recurrence of typical atrial flutter, even in this high-risk population. Given the exploratory nature of these analyses, further research is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.