ArticleClinical kidney journal2026
Cord blood-derived mesenchymal stromal cells in children with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome: a prospective phase II study.
Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Children with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS) require long-term immunosuppressive (IS) treatment, significantly impacting their quality of life. Cord-blood-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (CB-MSCs) are multipotent stem cells with proven immunomodulatory properties. Methods: We conducted an adaptive, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial with an adaptive second part to evaluate the efficacy of CB-MSCs in children aged 3-18 years with SDNS in remission for ≥6 months on IS therapy. In Part 1, patients received three intravenous infusions of CB-MSCs (1.5 × 10⁶/kg) at 1-2-week intervals, with rapid IS tapering and discontinuation after the third infusion. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival at 6 months post-IS withdrawal, with a threshold of <4/11 relapsing patients. In the adaptive Part 2, IS was discontinued before the first infusion to enhance CB-MSCs activity, and the dose was increased to 2 × 10⁶/kg, with a booster fourth infusion. A historical cohort of SDNS children tapering IS under standard care served as a post-hoc control. Results: In Part 1, 9 patients were enrolled, and 7/9 (78%) relapsed, failing to meet the prespecified efficacy threshold. In Part 2, 11 patients were enrolled; 9 (82%) were in remission at 2 weeks post-third infusion and received the boosted dose. However, 6/11 (55%) relapsed within 6 months, with no significant difference in relapse-free survival compared to Part 1 ( Conclusion: In children with SDNS, this novel therapy with CB-MSCs was safe but failed to improve relapse-free survival 6 months after IS withdrawal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.