Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42395857›Full record

Articlenpj computational materials2026

Flexible uncertainty calibration for machine-learned interatomic potentials.

Cheuk Hin Ho, Christoph Ortner, YangShuai Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in npj computational materials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cheuk Hin HoDepartment of Mathematics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada.
Christoph OrtnerDepartment of Mathematics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada.
YangShuai WangDepartment of Mathematics, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliable uncertainty quantification (UQ) is essential for developing machine-learned interatomic potentials (MLIPs) in predictive atomistic simulations. Conformal prediction (CP) is a statistical framework that constructs prediction intervals with guaranteed coverage under minimal assumptions, making it an attractive tool for UQ. However, existing CP techniques, while offering formal coverage guarantees, often lack accuracy, scalability, and adaptability to the complexity of atomic environments. In this work, we present a flexible uncertainty calibration framework for MLIPs, inspired by CP but reformulated as a parameterized optimization problem. This formulation enables the direct learning of environment-dependent quantile functions, producing sharper and more adaptive predictive intervals at negligible computational cost. Using the foundation model MACE-MP-0 as a representative case, we demonstrate the framework across diverse benchmarks, including ionic crystals, catalytic surfaces, and molecular systems. Our results achieve substantial improvements in uncertainty-error correlation, improve the detection of high-error configurations for active learning, and transfer reliably across distinct exchange-correlation functionals. Importantly, it is general, data efficient, and compatible with diverse MLIP architectures and baseline UQ schemes, offering a practical route toward robust and transferable atomistic simulations.

Indexed as

Materials scienceMathematics and computingPhysics

Identifiers

PMID42395857
PMCPMC13322957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.