ArticleJournal of geriatric cardiology : JGC2026
Predictors of early cerebrovascular events after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early cerebrovascular events (CVEs) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are severe complications, but effective methods for predicting and preventing these events have not been well established. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to identify significant predictors of early CVEs post-TAVR. Methods: MEDLINE/Embase databases were searched for articles published between December 2015 and April 2023. Original studies evaluating predictors of CVEs within 30 days post-TAVR after adjusting for confounders were included. Two investigators independently extracted data following the PRISMA statement. Meta-analyses of multivariable data were performed using DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models, with results expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Robustness was assessed via Harbord's test, nonparametric trim-and-fill analysis, leave-one-out sensitivity analysis, the QUIPS quality assessment tools, meta-regression, and subgroup analyses. Results: Among the 74 included studies, multivariate meta-analyses identified 11 predictors of early CVEs, including 9 patient-level predictors-a CHA Conclusions: This study identified multiple patient-level and procedure-level factors associated or not associated with early CVEs after TAVR. These findings support the development of a comprehensive risk prediction model that can accommodate diverse patient populations and evolving procedural techniques, thereby enhancing clinical risk management strategies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.