Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42395611›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026

Case Report: Breaking the cycle: preventing diagnostic escalation in pediatric chronic functional abdominal pain.

Khayreddine Bouabida, Margarieta Okang

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Khayreddine BouabidaUConn Health, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, United States.
Margarieta OkangUConn Health, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic abdominal pain in children often stems from disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI), yet families may struggle to accept these diagnoses when tests are normal. This case describes an eleven-year-old boy with persistent epigastric pain after abdominal injury whose presentation was most consistent with functional abdominal pain-not otherwise specified (FAP-NOS) under the Rome IV criteria. Despite extensive negative evaluations, his family believed vascular pathology was responsible, leading to escalating interventions including celiac plexus block and median arcuate ligament release. Symptoms returned post-operatively, consistent with gut-brain interaction rather than structural disease. This case underscores the critical need for early, clear explanations of gut-brain mechanisms that validate symptoms and address caregiver concerns, preventing diagnostic escalation and iatrogenic harm while supporting functional recovery.

Indexed as

abdominal painchronic functional abdominal paindiagnostic escalationdisorder of gut-brain interactioniatrogenic harmmedian arcuate ligament syndrome

Identifiers

PMID42395611
PMCPMC13323671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.