Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42395585›Full record

ArticleFood & nutrition research2026

Investigations of a multi-objective diet optimization model including human health, environment, and observed dietary intake.

Anne Carolin Schäfer, Heiner Boeing, Rozenn Gazan, Johanna Conrad, Brecht Devleesschauwer, Kurt Gedrich, Hans Hauner, Anja Kroke, Jakob Linseisen, Micha Limbeck and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food & nutrition research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Anne Carolin SchäferGerman Nutrition Society, Bonn, Germany.
Heiner BoeingDepartment of Epidemiology (closed), German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Nuthetal, Germany.
Rozenn GazanMS-Nutrition, Marseille, France.
Johanna ConradGerman Nutrition Society, Bonn, Germany.
Brecht DevleesschauwerDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Kurt GedrichResearch Group Public Health Nutrition, ZIEL - Institute for Food & Health, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
Hans HaunerInstitute of Nutritional Medicine, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Anja KrokeDepartment of Food, Nutrition and Consumer Studies, Fulda University of Applied Sciences, Fulda, Germany.
Jakob LinseisenInstitute of Epidemiology, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Micha LimbeckGerman Nutrition Society, Bonn, Germany.
Stefan LorkowskiInstitute of Nutritional Sciences, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Lukas SchwingshacklInstitute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center - Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Florent VieuxMS-Nutrition, Marseille, France.
Kiran VirmaniGerman Nutrition Society, Bonn, Germany.
Ute NöthlingsInstitute of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Nutritional Epidemiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Bernhard WatzlGerman Nutrition Society, Bonn, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Food-based dietary guidelines (FBDGs) provide recommendations on diets that aim to decrease disease risk and environmental impact, while remaining culturally acceptable for the population. Using mathematical optimization to define such diets, these objectives can be operationalized as components of the objective function. Objectives: To 1) derive an indicator that quantifies diet-related disease burden and 2) evaluate different weighting schemes within a three-dimensional diet optimization model. Design: To address objective 1), disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) from the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) and a diet-specific burden estimate based on observational data were transformed into a model-compatible indicator using linear interpolation. To address objective 2), a linear diet optimization model was developed. It included constraints on nutrients and acceptability, and a three-objective function that minimized disease burden (DALYs), environmental impact (greenhouse gas emissions and land use), and, as a proxy for cultural acceptability, deviation from the observed diet. Forty-two model variations with different weighting schemes were computed and compared regarding component outcomes. Results: In proof-of-concept analyses, the derived health indicator aligned closely with values reported in the literature: 90% (based on GBD) and 99% (based on the observational data) of diet-related DALYs were captured. Among the 42 model variations, strong synergies were observed between health and environmental outcomes. Optimizing exclusively for disease burden or environmental impact resulted in substantial deviations from the observed diet, underscoring the importance of considering cultural acceptability. Model stability improved with the inclusion of all three components. Conclusion: The proposed methodology enables the integration of DALYs and provides insights about various weighting schemes to establish a diet optimization model that minimizes disease burden, environmental impact, and deviation from the observed diet, and serves as the basis to derive FBDG for Germany.

Indexed as

diet modelingdiet optimizationfood-based dietary guidelinesmulti-objective optimizationsustainable diets

Identifiers

PMID42395585
PMCPMC13326015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.