ArticleFood & nutrition research2026
Investigations of a multi-objective diet optimization model including human health, environment, and observed dietary intake.
Article in Food & nutrition research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reducing disease burden through sustainable diets: a modeling approach for national food-based dietary guidelines.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Food-based dietary guidelines (FBDGs) provide recommendations on diets that aim to decrease disease risk and environmental impact, while remaining culturally acceptable for the population. Using mathematical optimization to define such diets, these objectives can be operationalized as components of the objective function. Objectives: To 1) derive an indicator that quantifies diet-related disease burden and 2) evaluate different weighting schemes within a three-dimensional diet optimization model. Design: To address objective 1), disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) from the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) and a diet-specific burden estimate based on observational data were transformed into a model-compatible indicator using linear interpolation. To address objective 2), a linear diet optimization model was developed. It included constraints on nutrients and acceptability, and a three-objective function that minimized disease burden (DALYs), environmental impact (greenhouse gas emissions and land use), and, as a proxy for cultural acceptability, deviation from the observed diet. Forty-two model variations with different weighting schemes were computed and compared regarding component outcomes. Results: In proof-of-concept analyses, the derived health indicator aligned closely with values reported in the literature: 90% (based on GBD) and 99% (based on the observational data) of diet-related DALYs were captured. Among the 42 model variations, strong synergies were observed between health and environmental outcomes. Optimizing exclusively for disease burden or environmental impact resulted in substantial deviations from the observed diet, underscoring the importance of considering cultural acceptability. Model stability improved with the inclusion of all three components. Conclusion: The proposed methodology enables the integration of DALYs and provides insights about various weighting schemes to establish a diet optimization model that minimizes disease burden, environmental impact, and deviation from the observed diet, and serves as the basis to derive FBDG for Germany.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.