ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
predNMD: prediction of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay for improved clinical variant pathogenicity classification.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The clinical consequence of a stop-gain variant depends on whether it ablates protein production by triggering nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) or yields truncated protein with residual, dominant-negative, or gain-of-function activity. This distinction is the key branch-point in applying PVS1, the strongest ACMG/AMP pathogenic evidence criterion. Current PVS1 guidelines and proposed SVC v4.0 successors risk unwarranted evidence assignment by employing only the 50nt rule for NMD prediction, which is central but incompletely captures NMD biology. We developed predNMD, a random forest classifier trained on 5,304 nonsense variants from GTEx, TCGA, GEUVADIS, and GREGoR. Feature selection reduced 166 candidates to 20 final features, 7 new to NMD prediction, including m6A density and TranslationAI. For variants predicted to not trigger NMD, predNMD infers the likely protein truncation. predNMD predictions aligned with deliberate clinical decisions where ClinGen Variant Curation Expert Panels (VCEPs) drew on evidence leading them to diverge from standard decision tree. predNMD agreed with VCEP on 6 of the 8 stop-gain variants for which they declined full PVS1, though the variants were predicted to trigger NMD by the 50nt rule and in loss-of-function disease genes. In leave-one-chromosome-out cross-validation predNMD reached AUC=0.79, and on independent test set outperformed 50nt rule (AUC 0.78 vs 0.65), nearly doubling discriminative signal above random (0.28 vs 0.15). predNMD likewise effectively discriminated NMD targets on BRCA1 and BARD1 saturation genome-editing data, where RNA abundance reflects NMD. These results support replacing the 50nt rule in clinical variant classification with predNMD, available as precomputed predictions covering all 13,968,776 possible stop-gain SNVs in GRCh38, installable codes, Docker image, and at predNMD.org.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.