ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Phylogenomic subsampling and upsampling for efficient evolutionary analyses of big data.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Long runtimes, high memory demands, and reliance on high-performance computing impede phylogenomic analyses. We review a scalable phylogenomic subsampling with upsampling (PSU) framework, in which small subsamples of sites from a concatenated alignment are expanded by upsampling before inference, and the resulting analyses are then aggregated to obtain evolutionary estimates. PSU harnesses the fact that the computational cost of maximum likelihood analysis is strongly influenced by the number of distinct site patterns in the concatenated alignment, whereas statistical power depends primarily on the amount of evolutionary information represented by the total number of sites and substitutions. By reducing the former while restoring the latter through upsampling, PSU can approximate many full-data analyses at substantially lower computational cost. Analysis of simulated and empirical datasets shows that PSU can accurately estimate bootstrap support values, select the optimal substitution model, test evolutionary hypotheses, and infer branch lengths, divergence times, and associated uncertainty measures, while reducing runtime and memory requirements by orders of magnitude. PSU also provides distributions of inferred clade support across independent subsamples, enabling detection of conflicting phylogenetic signals that may remain hidden in conventional bootstrap analysis. Automated tuning of subsample size, the number of subsamples, and the number of upsampling replicates make PSU practical across diverse datasets. We suggest that PSU is a general strategy for scalable phylogenomic inference using a broad range of statistical methods. By enabling analyses of genome-scale alignments on commodity hardware, PSU broadens research access and reduces environmental and infrastructural costs of big-data phylogenomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.