ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
The Importance of Synchrony in the Neural Control of Movement.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Throughout the mammalian cortex, populations of neurons must work together to enact behaviors. While population recordings in motor cortex have revealed many aspects of when neurons fire during behaviors, limitations in causal experiments have made it difficult to identify which features of neural activity directly drive movements and which do not. Here, we explicitly test the principles of neural coding using high temporal precision multiphoton holographic optogenetics in the motor cortex. We show that activation of a small number (50-75) of Layer 2/3 excitatory neurons in the motor cortex is sufficient to drive movements. The efficacy of stimulation-driven movement depends on the state of the local circuit, and, to a lesser extent, the identity of which neurons are stimulated. We test whether evoked activity is acting through a 'rate code' or a 'timing code' by holding the firing rate and cell identities constant while varying the millisecond precise timing of activation. We find an unexpected and strong dependence on inter-cell synchrony when evoking movements. This neural synchrony recruits distinct patterns of recurrent excitation and inhibition. These findings provide evidence that the timing code, more so than the rate code, drives motor output.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.