ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Interaction forces reflect the perception of texture during active exploration.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We are constantly exploring the world around us through touch. Active touch depends on coordination of movement and force, yet the forces used during natural exploration and their relationship with perception is largely unexplored. Here we measured exploration forces together with fingertip motion while 17 participants explored 14 textures and rated their perceived hardness, slipperiness, or roughness. Exploration strategies differed systematically across tasks: hardness judgments involved relatively stationary pressing with larger and more variable normal forces, whereas slipperiness and roughness judgments relied more on sweeping movements. Within tasks, interaction forces covaried with perceptual ratings: harder textures elicited larger maximum tangential forces, consistent with diagonal pressing, while more slippery textures were explored with faster fingertip motion and lower forces. Estimated dynamic friction was negatively correlated with perceived slipperiness but not roughness. At the same time perceived roughness was strongly related to vibrations in the force, indicating distinct physical bases for these perceptual dimensions. These results show that humans actively tailor contact mechanics to perceptual goals during active exploration, supporting a sensorimotor account of texture perception.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.