Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42395490›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Simulation of cell-size systems at long timescales with flexible protein structures.

Kamila Yunas, Amar Singh, Matthew M Copeland, Andrii M Tytarenko, Petras J Kundrotas, Randal Halfmann, Pavlo O Kasyanov, Eugene A Feinberg, Ilya A Vakser

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kamila YunasComputational Biology Program, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA.
Amar SinghComputational Biology Program, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9582-670X
Matthew M CopelandComputational Biology Program, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0696-4746
Andrii M TytarenkoInstitute for Applied System Analysis at the Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute, Kyiv 03056, Ukraine.ORCID 0000-0002-8265-642X
Petras J KundrotasComputational Biology Program, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5080-1664
Randal HalfmannStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6592-1471
Pavlo O KasyanovInstitute for Applied System Analysis at the Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute, Kyiv 03056, Ukraine.ORCID 0000-0002-6662-0160
Eugene A FeinbergDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8263-0772
Ilya A VakserComputational Biology Program, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5743-2934

Funding

Modeling of macromolecular interactions in the cellR35GM156453 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI ILYA VAKSER · 2025 to 2026
$671k
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM156453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein behavior inside cells is dominated by the crowded nature of the intracellular environment. Progress in structure determination of proteins and protein complexes, based on advances in Artificial Intelligence, provides an opportunity for structure-based modeling of cellular phenomena. Such modeling at the atomic resolution has been advanced by the traditional simulation techniques, e.g. molecular dynamics. A recently developed docking-based approach implements Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling of intermolecular energy landscapes, offering several orders of magnitude faster simulation protocols. The approach allows addressing much longer trajectories of macromolecular systems in the crowded intracellular environment at atomic resolution. The sampling by design avoids low-probability (high-energy) states, which greatly accelerates the simulation process. A notable feature of this docking-based approach is the rigid body approximation of protein structures. The rigid-body approximation had been the primary direction in the protein docking field up until recent developments in deep learning. The rigid-body approach should be quite robust for the higher energy transient interactions that dominate the highly crowded cellular environment, as they likely involve relatively small conformational change. However, it is less applicable to the low-energy protein-protein complexes, especially those involving flexible regions. We addressed this problem by incorporating AlphaFold3 top models of the protein complexes in the mapping of the intermolecular energy landscape, as representative of the low-energy configurations of the protein assembly. By the nature of the AlphaFold predictions, these models involve appropriate conformational change between unbound and bound structures. These low-energy docking poses are combined with the rigid-body docking predictions that cover the multiplicity of the transient interactions. Such combination directly addresses the conformational flexibility of proteins upon binding along with the multiplicity of the transient protein encounters in the crowded cellular environment.

Identifiers

PMID42395490
PMCPMC13320794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.