ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Functional Somatotopy of Lumbar Dorsal Rootlets and its Role in Selective Recruitment via Lateral Spinal Cord Stimulation.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Lateral spinal cord stimulation (LSCS) is a promising approach for restoring somatosensory feedback in lower-limb amputees, but its spatial selectivity remains limited. Percepts often spread to unintended regions of the residual limb, and reducing electrode contact size may not improve focality. This study investigated whether the anatomical organization of lumbar dorsal rootlets (DR) imposes fundamental constraints on LSCS selectivity. Approach: Acute neurophysiology experiments were performed in six adult cats. Both LSCS and individual DR stimulation were conducted in the same animals. For DR stimulation, bipolar hook electrodes were used to stimulate individual DR, while antidromic compound action potentials (CAPs) were recorded from femoral and sciatic nerve branches instrumented with nerve cuffs. For LSCS, custom 32-contact epidural paddle electrodes were placed over the lateral surface of the spinal cord at corresponding vertebral levels. Recruitment thresholds, dynamic ranges, and response patterns were analyzed across spinal levels, and DR recruitment patterns were directly compared to those evoked by LSCS within the same animals. Main results: A clear rostrocaudal organization was observed across spinal levels during stimulation of individual DR, with femoral branches predominantly recruited at L4-L5 and sciatic branches at L6-L7. However, no somatotopic organization was found across DR within each spinal level; individual DR frequently co-activated multiple branches within the same group, and selective recruitment could only be maintained over a narrow dynamic range (median ~10 μA). LSCS exhibited even a narrower dynamic range (~5 μA) but closely mirrored DR recruitment patterns, indicating that LSCS activates sensory afferents in a manner determined by the organizational structure of the DR. Significance: These findings demonstrate that the limited spatial selectivity of LSCS can largely be attributed to the coarse organization of DR within each root level rather than due to limitations of epidural electrode design. Moving electrodes intradurally or reducing contact size further is unlikely to substantially improve focality. Instead, improving paddle stability to ensure consistent placement over the appropriate spinal levels may be a more effective strategy for enhancing percept localization.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.