ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Random innervation of cerebellar Purkinje cells as a substrate for diverse representational learning.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although the cerebellar microcircuit is among the most well-characterized systems for studying neural computation, recent connectomic analyses highlight deviations from canonical models, raising fundamental questions about connectivity, function, and learning in the system. A key feature of the circuit is the convergence of a vast number of parallel fibers (PFs) onto Purkinje cells (PCs). Prevailing models of cerebellar computation assume all-to-all connectivity at this intersection, whereby a single PC "samples" from all PFs. However, experimental evidence suggests that each PC is innervated by only a subset of accessible PFs. This partial sampling creates differential connectivity that may reflect an organizational principle of cerebellar learning, but its implications are poorly understood. Based on electron microscopy (EM) reconstructions, we show that PF innervation of PCs is largely consistent with a Bernoulli model where connections are randomly and independently distributed within anatomical constraints. In further support of a random model, we observe that connections of the ascending branches of granule cells are not predictive of connections of their PFs, nor is connectivity correlated across separate spatial encounters of a PF with the same PC. In a model of the cerebellar circuit, we then address the possibility that partial connectivity is a substrate of learning, i.e., a fixed, random mask that enforces diversity between PCs. We find that when considering "ensembles" of PCs, random partial connectivity can indeed outperform all-to-all connectivity. Our results provide a theoretical framework for understanding the role of partial connectivity between cerebellar PFs and PCs and may have implications for cerebellum-like systems and beyond.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.