ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Defining the molecular tolerance-to-damage landscape of SMARCA4 helicase genetic alterations.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evaluating the impact of genomic variation is essential for identifying underlying mechanistic causes of human diseases. The spectrum of neurodevelopmental disorders is driven by diverse genetic alterations with genes like SMARCA4 being prototypical examples. There have been significant hurdles to implementing the protein-specific and mechanism-informed variation effect predictors that are anticipated to have the highest yield of mechanistic information. Yet, there is a pressing need, for example, within SMARCA4 where 98% of the 2780 reported variants lack a disposition and remain of uncertain significance (VUS). Further, the field has yet to identify each variant's specific molecular mechanism, which will inform targeted therapeutic development strategies. In this study we developed a mechanistic structure-informed helicase-specific variant effect predictor by leveraging diverse information with state-specific calculations. Our approach has 100% recall of pathogenic variants while classifying 87.23% of VUS into damaging (55.74%, n=262) versus tolerated effects (31.49%, n=148), including those with conflicting interpretations. This analysis reveals significant enrichment of integrated functional metrics, such as conservation and solvent exposure, that parallel allele frequences in health populations, and emphasizes the robustness of the method. Thus, we have demonstrated a novel approach for the development of mechanism-informed protein-specific interpretation of human genetic information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.