ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Ambiguity-Aware Multi-Stage Cell-Type Annotation for Spatial Transcriptomics.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spatial transcriptomics enables characterization of cellular organization in intact tissue, but robust cell-type annotation remains challenging due to heterogeneous expression profiles, mixed populations, and transitional states. Existing methods often enforce a single label per cluster, obscuring biologically meaningful ambiguity and producing overconfident assignments. We propose an ambiguity-aware, multi-stage framework for spatial cell-type annotation. The method combines hybrid spatial-feature clustering with constrained language-model inference over curated label sets, and assigns confidence scores based on marker coverage, candidate separation, and entropy. Low-confidence clusters are selectively refined via local reclustering of ambiguous regions, while unresolved clusters are preserved as mixed rather than forcibly labeled. Applied to 10x Genomics Xenium spatial transcriptomics data from cholangiocarcinoma, the proposed refinement reduces cluster-level ambiguity from 16.1% to 2.27% and cell-level ambiguity from 18.4% to 0.86%, while improving confidence calibration. Spatial ablation confirms that topological integration resolves structural ambiguity over feature-only baselines, while constrained inference via a lightweight language model ensures scalable and biologically coherent annotations. These results highlight the importance of explicit ambiguity handling for reliable spatial annotation in heterogeneous tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.