ArticleDigital health
From reporting gaps to hospital cost drivers to enhance digital health decision making: A machine learning-assisted analysis of national hospital data.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Hospitals across the United States face growing operational and financial strain, resulting in closures that threaten healthcare access and system resilience. This study aimed to identify significant predictors of hospital total facility expenditures and to evaluate the performance of multiple imputation methods for incomplete data in the American Hospital Association (AHA) Annual Survey Database. Methods: The de-identified 2022-2023 AHA survey data (n=12,359) comprising 34 financial, structural, and operational features was analyzed. Missing data were addressed using the Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations (MICE) framework, comparing regression-based and machine learning-based algorithms. Random Forest (RF) imputation was selected for its superior accuracy based on fivefold cross-validation. Linear regression models were fitted on five RF-imputed datasets to identify key determinants of total facility expenditure (EXPTOT). Results: RF-based imputation achieved the lowest error and highest consistency across variable types. Regression results identified full-time registered nurses (FTRNTF), facility size (GFEET), and property and equipment costs (PLNTA) as the strongest predictors of hospital expenditure (p<0.001). Hospitals with community designations, oncology or research services, and Joint Commission accreditation had significantly higher expenditures, whereas rural and community trauma centers reported lower costs. Geographic visualization revealed substantial disparities in hospital resources and expenditures, especially in rural areas. Conclusion: Machine learning-based multiple imputation improves data completeness and modeling accuracy for hospital operations research. Findings highlight critical cost drivers and geographic inequities, informing data-driven policymaking and resource allocation in health system management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.