ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Transcranial magnetic stimulation and motor overflow: a systematic review in neurological disorders.
Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exercise-induced neuropeptidergic and neurochemical neuroadaptation in stress regulation and emotional disorders.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motor overflow, a neuromotor phenomenon characterized by involuntary activation of muscles during voluntary movement, reflects impairments in interhemispheric and intracortical inhibition and is commonly observed in conditions such as stroke, cerebral palsy, dystonia, and Parkinson's disease. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive neuromodulatory technique with potential to modulate the cortical excitability underlying overflow-related dysfunctions. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of TMS in reducing motor overflow across neurological populations. Seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, encompassing participants with stroke, cerebral palsy, Parkinson's disease, and focal hand dystonia. Protocols varied in frequency (1-10 Hz), target area (M1, SMA, PSC, PMC), and design (e.g., crossover, combined protocols with constraint-induced therapy or cerebellar stimulation; Motor overflow was directly assessed in only two studies, one involving Parkinson's disease and one involving dystonia, thereby limiting cross-study comparisons. Therefore, evidence supporting a direct effect of TMS on motor overflow remains preliminary and condition-specific. In dystonia, high-frequency rTMS (10 Hz) targeting the primary somatosensory cortex led to significant reductions in overflow, demonstrated by handwriting kinematics. In Parkinson's disease, although physiological modulation (reduced IHI) was observed after SMA stimulation, mirror movements remained unchanged. In stroke and cerebral palsy populations, overflow was not directly evaluated, though improvements in motor function, spasticity, and cortical excitability were consistently reported. Risk of bias was low in most included studies, although gaps in allocation reporting and standardization of outcome measures were noted. This review highlights the potential of TMS, particularly high-frequency protocols, to modulate motor overflow in focal dystonia. However, the lack of targeted assessment in other neurological conditions suggests a critical need for future trials with standardized protocols and specific outcome measures focused on overflow to clarify the therapeutic role of TMS in rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.