Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42395303›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

A scoping review of mental health problems and associated psychological factors pertinent to young people in education in low-and middle-income countries.

Tara Linda Murphy, Abbie Smith, Cris Glazebrook, Elena Nixon

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tara Linda MurphyMental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Abbie SmithTic Service, Psychological and Mental Health Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Cris GlazebrookMental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Elena NixonMental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The objective of this scoping review is to identify how adolescent mental health is assessed and the psychological factors it has been associated with young people in education in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs). Method: A review of the published academic literature was conducted to explore the breadth, scope, and nature of research using the eligibility criteria of school/college-attending young people (aged 4-22 years) from LMICs with use of standardized measures. Three databases were searched: Medline, EMBASE, and PsycINFO, covering the period from 1970 to September 30, 2025. A logic grid using relevant population, construct, and context search terms guided the search. The six-stage scoping review methodological framework by Arksey and O'Malley was used. Results: The search yielded 1,493 records, of which 498 duplicates were removed and 995 were screened. Thirty six studies met the inclusion criteria. Thirty-two of these studies were conducted in middle-income countries. Ten of the articles described intervention studies and most of the studies were cross sectional. Mental health outcomes assessed were depression, anxiety, trauma, suicidality, eating disorder symptoms, psychological distress and general mental health screening. Assessed psychological factors associated with mental health outcomes included self-esteem, self-efficacy, resilience, coping, perceived social support, school connectedness, emotional intelligence and emotional regulation, mastery, and life satisfaction. Findings show that depression was the most commonly assessed mental health outcome and self-esteem was the most frequently researched psychological factor. Conclusion: The study revealed considerable variability in how mental health was assessed, underscoring the need for greater consistency and contextual sensitivity. These findings highlight the importance of developing interventions tailored to local contexts in LMICs to more effectively support youth mental health. The need for measurement consistency and contextual adaptation of intervention in this literature is indicated.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesMental DisordersMental HealthStudentsAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolHumansSelf ConceptYoung Adulteducation-attending young peopleLMICmental health problemspsychological factorsresilienceself-esteemyouth mental health

Identifiers

PMID42395303
PMCPMC13322913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.