Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42395278›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

ACTIVE involvement in alcohol care: a community case study in coproduction.

Vicky Best, Lucy Bryan, Stan Edmunds, Nancy Kitch, Elizabeth Sastre, Kerry Wells, Michelle McNeice, Lynn Owens, Mandy Smith, Ravi Menghani and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Vicky BestACTIVE, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Lucy BryanACTIVE, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Stan EdmundsACTIVE, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Nancy KitchACTIVE, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth SastreACTIVE, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Kerry WellsACTIVE, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Michelle McNeiceACTIVE, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Lynn OwensFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Mandy SmithDepartment of Hepatology, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Ravi MenghaniCHAMPS Public Health Collaborative, Wallasey, United Kingdom.
Hannah SharpCHAMPS Public Health Collaborative, Wallasey, United Kingdom.
Paul RichardsonFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Janet GarnerSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.
Mick McKeownSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is a descriptive case study of a public engagement group of people who have used alcohol care services. Involvement of people with lived and living experience is increasingly recognized as essential in health and social care policy. However, in alcohol care services, such involvement remains underdeveloped and sometimes tokenistic. This community case study outlines the establishment, development, and impact of the ACTIVE (Alcohol Care Team InVolvement and Engagement) group-a pioneering public and patient involvement and engagement (PPIE) initiative in alcohol care services across Merseyside and Cheshire (UK). The group was established through collaboration between the Programme for Alcohol Care and Treatment (PROACT, a regional public health network bringing together all alcohol care providers), public health commissioners (Champs Public Health Collaborative), and the Comensus PPIE model at the University of Lancashire. It was designed to create safe spaces for meaningful coproduction and deliberative democratic communication between people with lived experience, practitioners, and commissioners. ACTIVE has contributed to service design and evaluation. Additional impacts include supporting digital innovation, strengthening regional networks, influencing innovation, and enhancing workforce education. Members reported enhanced confidence, sense of value, and shared ownership of service development. The approach illustrates the replicable potential of sustained, well-resourced involvement of people with lived experience in alcohol care, having implications for policy, research, innovation, and service delivery nationally and internationally. The case study has been collectively authored utilizing notes of meetings and drawing upon contributions within a series of reflective meetings and exchanges of drafts.

Indexed as

AlcoholismCommunity ParticipationPatient ParticipationHumansOrganizational Case StudiesUnited Kingdomalcohol carecoproductionlived experiencenursing leadershippatient and public involvementpeer supportservice development

Identifiers

PMID42395278
PMCPMC13323507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.