ArticleCureus2026
Effects of Treatment With Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Solution 0.09% on Dry Eye Questionnaire Scores Among Patients With Dry Eye Disease.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective This multicenter, retrospective study was conducted to evaluate patient-reported scores for the 5-part Dry Eye Questionnaire (DEQ-5) over a six-month treatment period using cyclosporine ophthalmic solution 0.09% (CsA 0.09%). Materials and methods Patients with moderate-to-severe dry eye disease (DED) who completed the DEQ-5 at baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment after one, three, and six months of twice-daily CsA 0.09% treatment were included in the study. Adverse events were recorded. Results A total of 392 patients entered the study. At baseline, the mean (standard deviation (SD)) DEQ-5 score was 14.7 (3.4). The scores improved to 12.6 (4.1), 11.9 (4.2), and 10.8 (4.4) at one, three, and six months, respectively, corresponding with reduced DED symptoms. Most patients reported improvements in DEQ-5 scores at each time point; by month six, 69/88 (78.4%) patients reported improved DEQ-5 scores from baseline, while 8/88 (9.1%) reported no changes and 11/88 (12.5%) reported progression of DED symptoms. Conclusions CsA 0.09% was well tolerated and led to significant improvements in DEQ-5 scores, reflecting better management of DED symptoms at one, three, and six months of treatment. These results highlight the potential of CsA 0.09% as a long-term treatment option for moderate to severe DED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.