Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42395228›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Effects of Treatment With Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Solution 0.09% on Dry Eye Questionnaire Scores Among Patients With Dry Eye Disease.

Rana Taji, King Y Chow, Shazia Hassan, Belinda Yap

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rana TajiOptometry, Toronto Medical Eye Associates, North York, CAN.
King Y ChowOphthalmology, Clarity Eye Institute, Newmarket, CAN.
Shazia HassanBiostatistics, Cencora, Innomar Strategies Inc., Oakville, CAN.
Belinda YapBiostatistics, Cencora, Innomar Strategies Inc., Oakville, CAN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective This multicenter, retrospective study was conducted to evaluate patient-reported scores for the 5-part Dry Eye Questionnaire (DEQ-5) over a six-month treatment period using cyclosporine ophthalmic solution 0.09% (CsA 0.09%). Materials and methods Patients with moderate-to-severe dry eye disease (DED) who completed the DEQ-5 at baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment after one, three, and six months of twice-daily CsA 0.09% treatment were included in the study. Adverse events were recorded. Results A total of 392 patients entered the study. At baseline, the mean (standard deviation (SD)) DEQ-5 score was 14.7 (3.4). The scores improved to 12.6 (4.1), 11.9 (4.2), and 10.8 (4.4) at one, three, and six months, respectively, corresponding with reduced DED symptoms. Most patients reported improvements in DEQ-5 scores at each time point; by month six, 69/88 (78.4%) patients reported improved DEQ-5 scores from baseline, while 8/88 (9.1%) reported no changes and 11/88 (12.5%) reported progression of DED symptoms. Conclusions CsA 0.09% was well tolerated and led to significant improvements in DEQ-5 scores, reflecting better management of DED symptoms at one, three, and six months of treatment. These results highlight the potential of CsA 0.09% as a long-term treatment option for moderate to severe DED.

Indexed as

cequadry eye questionnairekeratoconjunctivitis siccalong-term treatmentretrospective study

Identifiers

PMID42395228
PMCPMC13327720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.