Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42395225›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Artificial Intelligence for Prognostic Modelling and Adaptive Treatment Monitoring in Radiation Oncology.

Krishna Chidrawar, Sandeep Kaur Toor, Shubham Gupta, Varsha Mary Khalkho, Abhishek Anand, Pallavi Yc

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Krishna ChidrawarDepartment of Radiology, Durga Diagnostic Centre, Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Nashik, IND.
Sandeep Kaur ToorDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Punjab Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, Mohali, IND.
Shubham GuptaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Government Medical College Jammu, Jammu, IND.
Varsha Mary KhalkhoDepartment of Radiology, School of Medical Sciences, Sri Satya Sai University of Technology and Medical Sciences, Sehore, IND.
Abhishek AnandDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Teerthanker Mahaveer College of Pharmacy, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad, IND.
Pallavi YcDepartment of Agadatantra and Vidhi Vaidyaka, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bengaluru, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being used in radiation oncology to help doctors predict patient outcomes and monitor treatment response. However, its routine use in clinical practice is still limited because available studies are not always consistent, methods are not fully standardised, and many AI tools have not been tested widely in real-world settings. This narrative review examines how AI is used for prognosis, adaptive radiotherapy, treatment response assessment, and toxicity prediction in radiation oncology. This review also considers AI applications in cancer screening, radiological diagnosis, and radiology-histopathology correlation, as these areas directly support prognostic modelling and adaptive treatment decisions. A structured literature search from 2015 to 2025 was performed across major biomedical databases, with attention to radiomics, machine learning, deep learning, response modelling, and adaptive treatment planning. Studies were reviewed for their design, validation methods, and clinical outcomes. Current evidence suggests that AI can improve risk prediction, support automatic tumour and organ segmentation, track changes during treatment, and identify early signs of toxicity better than some conventional approaches. However, many studies still lack external validation and multicentre data. Challenges also remain in making AI models easy to understand and compatible with existing clinical systems. Combining imaging data with genomic information and radiation dose parameters may further improve prediction. In clinical practice, AI may help personalise radiation dose, support timely treatment plan adjustment, and improve resource use. Wider adoption will require stronger validation, standardised workflows, and clear model governance. Overall, AI should be used as a decision-support tool to assist clinicians rather than replace clinical expertise.

Indexed as

adaptive radiotherapyartificial intelligencedeep learningprognostic modellingradiomics

Identifiers

PMID42395225
PMCPMC13325595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.