ReviewCureus2026
A Multidisciplinary Approach to Addressing Barriers in Osteoporosis Screening, Diagnosis, Therapy Sequencing, and Adherence in India.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Obesity-related bone fragility: An emerging clinical paradox.The Indian journal of medical research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoporosis is a significant public health problem in India. In India, osteoporosis has unique characteristics; an earlier onset of disease is seen because of the inherently low peak bone mass in Indian subjects compared with that in Western populations. This leads to a higher burden of osteoporotic fractures. At the same time, other contributing factors include genetic predisposition, poor calcium diets, limited sun exposure, and an overall higher prevalence of metabolic loading factors such as diabetes. Despite this, awareness and screening remain inadequate. Diagnosis is delayed because access to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry is limited, and poor long-term adherence to treatment compounds the difficulties of primary and secondary prevention. Early screening using validated tools such as the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool, the Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians, or the Simple Calculated Osteoporosis Risk Estimation is essential, particularly in high-risk populations. Risk stratification and imaging are key to guiding individualized treatment with antiresorptive agents such as denosumab and/or anabolic agents like teriparatide. Real-world barriers, including financial constraints, lack of awareness, and the absence of coordinated care models such as fracture liaison services, further limit effective management. With this background of special circumstances in Indian settings, a three-level care model is proposed, featuring community-level screening by primary care teams, diagnosis and initial treatment by specialists, and complex-case management centers with integrated support from allied healthcare professionals and community health workers. Implementing this stratified, multidisciplinary protocol has the potential to bridge existing gaps in osteoporosis care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.