ArticleCureus2026
Standardization and Validation of a Methodology for Assessing Least Reflection Factor and Skin Lipid Replenishment Using Skin Reflectance and Biophysical Measurements.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAssessment of skin lipid replenishment and surface appearance requires standardized methodologies capable of measuring both skin-reflecting and barrier-related skin properties. The least-reflection factor (LRF) reflects skin shine and surface lipid presence and is influenced by skin shine and sebum levels. Furthermore, lipid replenishment of the stratum corneum is associated with barrier-related parameters such as skin hydration, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), and surface scaliness. Integrating the reflecting and biophysical parameters may provide a comprehensive approach for evaluating skin surface refinement and barrier restoration; however, standardized methodologies combining these parameters remain limited.
objectiveTo standardize and validate a reliable and reproducible methodological framework for assessing the LRF and skin lipid replenishment using biophysical measurements, focusing on skin shine, sebum levels, hydration, TEWL, and skin surface microrelief parameters.
methodsThis single-center, exploratory, validation study used an open-label, split-face design, including fifteen healthy adult participants with normal to dry and sensitive skin. Each participant served as their own control, with a lipid-replenishing topical product applied to one facial site and water applied to the opposite site. Assessments included skin shine and LRF, sebum levels, skin hydration, TEWL, and skin surface microrelief parameters such as smoothness, roughness, and scaliness. Measurements were performed at baseline and 15 minutes after application under controlled environmental conditions.
resultsPost-application evaluations at the test site demonstrated increased skin hydration by 46.20 ± 5.87 (p value <0.0001), reduced TEWL by 8.26 ± 0.63 (p value <0.0001), and improved surface smoothness by 361.70 ± 63.99 (p value <0.0001), skin shine by 4.14 ± 0.12 (p value <0.001), reduced skin sebum level by 11.99 ± 3.68 (p value <0.01) while control sites remained within physiological ranges. Skin surface shine remained unchanged, and sebum levels showed no variation, indicating that changes in the LRF were directionally consistent.
conclusionThis study established a standardized methodology for evaluating LRF and lipid replenishment-related skin changes using integrated skin reflectance and biophysical measurements. The methodology demonstrated the ability to detect instant changes in skin barrier function and surface morphology. LRF showed potential as a reflecting parameter associated with skin shine and surface characteristics, supporting its use in dermatological and cosmetic research evaluating skin surface quality and barrier restoration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.