ArticleCureus2026
Outcomes in the Older Appalachian Trauma Population After Falls Caused by Dogs: Who Let the Dogs Out?
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Falls continue to be among the leading causes of nonfatal injuries in the United States. Falls are common among the older population, and the Appalachian region is considered one with an aging population. Pet ownership is common and has even increased since 2020. Few studies exist on the topic of falls caused by dogs. Methods Data were retrospectively pulled from the trauma registry at a rural Appalachian Level 1 trauma center between January 1, 2017, and June 15, 2022. Patients ≥18 who presented to the facility due to falling or tripping caused by dogs were included. Injuries due to dog bites were excluded. Results A total of 94 patients were included in the study, all of whom sustained an injury. Patients ≥65 years represented 68.1% of the cohort population. Females represented most of the population with 73.4% (P<0.001). Hip/pelvic fractures were the leading cause of injury and were a significant predictor of outcomes for the older population. Hip fractures were significantly higher in those aged ≥65 years compared to those <65 years of age (92% vs 7%, P<0.001). The ≥65-year group also had significantly longer hospital length of stay (4.5 vs 3.2 days, P=0.046). Patients aged ≥65 years were 10.3 times more likely to be discharged to a care facility and were discharged most often to skilled nursing (odds ratio (OR)=10.292, 95% confidence interval (CI)=3.194-33.161, P<0.001). Conclusion Females were more likely to experience trauma because of a dog-related trip or fall. Older people are more prone to falling due to dogs and experiencing hip/pelvic fractures. These patients are also more likely to be discharged to a care facility, most commonly skilled nursing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.