ArticleCureus2026
Intermittent Torsion of a Wandering Spleen: A Case of Recurrent Acute Abdominal Pain.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wandering spleen is a rare condition resulting from congenital or acquired laxity of the splenic ligaments, predisposing the organ to abnormal mobility and torsion of its vascular pedicle. We report a case of a patient presenting with recurrent episodes of acute abdominal pain due to intermittent torsion of a wandering spleen, characterized by spontaneous resolution between attacks and diagnostic uncertainty on initial evaluation. Clinical presentation was nonspecific, with episodic left-sided abdominal pain and variable examination findings, while routine laboratory investigations were largely unremarkable. Cross-sectional imaging played a decisive role in diagnosis, demonstrating ectopic splenic location in the lower abdomen with an elongated vascular pedicle and features consistent with intermittent torsion. The patient underwent surgical management with intraoperative confirmation of splenic mobility and vascular compromise without established infarction. Definitive treatment resulted in the resolution of symptoms and no recurrence on follow-up. This case highlights the importance of considering wandering spleen in the differential diagnosis of recurrent acute abdomen, particularly when imaging reveals a mobile or ectopic spleen. Early recognition through appropriate imaging is essential to prevent complications such as splenic infarction and to allow timely surgical intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.