ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2026
Survival Outcomes of Gemcitabine-Cisplatin-S-1 Versus Gemcitabine-Cisplatin in Unresectable Biliary Tract Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study With a Focus on Conversion Surgery.
Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) has been the global standard for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). The triplet regimen gemcitabine-cisplatin-S-1 (GCS) demonstrated superiority in the MITSUBA trial, but its real-world effectiveness remains unclear. We compared survival outcomes of GCS versus GC, focusing on conversion surgery (CS). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 542 patients with unresectable BTC treated between 2017 and 2024 at 19 Japanese institutions. Patients received GC ( Results: Patients treated with GCS achieved greater tumor shrinkage (median -23.0% vs. -10.0%, Conclusions: Treatment with GCS was associated with longer survival compared with GC in unresectable BTC, alongside a higher rate of conversion surgery, which was associated with favorable long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.