Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42395108›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of radiology2026

Venous excess doppler ultrasound: What radiologists should know in 2026.

Chail Shah, Deepak Shah, Abhilash Koratala

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chail ShahNeurocritical Care, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, United States.
Deepak ShahRadiology, Dr RM Shah Memorial Center, Mumbai 400050, Maharashtra, India.
Abhilash KoratalaDivision of Nephrology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, United States. akoratala@mcw.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systemic venous congestion is increasingly recognized as a key contributor to organ dysfunction and adverse outcomes, particularly in the cardiorenal and critical care settings. Elevated right-sided cardiac pressures are transmitted retrogradely to the hepatic, splanchnic, and renal venous systems, leading to impaired organ perfusion, increased interstitial pressure, and complications such as acute kidney injury. Conventional clinical markers and biomarkers of congestion lack sensitivity for detecting early or subclinical venous hypertension. In contrast, ultrasound, particularly when incorporating abdominal venous Doppler assessment, enables a more granular, physiologically grounded evaluation of congestion. The venous excess ultrasound (VExUS) score integrates inferior vena cava assessment with hepatic, portal, and intrarenal venous Doppler waveforms to provide a structured framework for grading venous congestion. VExUS has been associated with renal outcomes, and morbidity and mortality in heart failure, and dynamic changes in venous Doppler patterns appear to carry prognostic significance. This review describes the physiologic basis of venous Doppler abnormalities, outlines the components and grading of the VExUS system, and highlights common technical and interpretive pitfalls that affect reliable assessment. Particular emphasis is placed on waveform morphology, electrocardiographic correlation, and optimization of Doppler acquisition. Given that abdominal Doppler studies are frequently performed for indications unrelated to heart failure, radiologists are uniquely positioned to recognize venous congestion on routine imaging. Incorporation of VExUS principles into radiologic reporting, along with standardized acquisition and multidisciplinary education, may enhance the clinical relevance of abdominal and renal vascular examinations and support earlier, physiologically informed hemodynamic intervention. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence, discusses technical and interpretive considerations, and provides practical guidance for radiologists incorporating VExUS into practice.

Indexed as

CongestionPoint-of-care ultrasoundRadiologyUltrasoundVenous excess ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID42395108
PMCPMC13324748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.