ArticleAmerican journal of preventive cardiology2026
Lipid management and cardiovascular risk assessment: Physician perspectives from seven countries across five WHORegions - insights from the INTERASPIRE study.
Article in American journal of preventive cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Lipid management and risk assessment are key to preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). As part of the INTERASPIRE study, we conducted a sub-study to evaluate physician practices in cardiovascular risk assessment and lipid management. Methods: A total of 245 physicians, including cardiologists, general physicians, endocrinologists, and lipidologists across seven countries (China, Colombia, Kenya, Malaysia, Nigeria, Poland, United Arab Emirates) completed a structured questionnaire. Results: Overall, 87 % of physicians reported estimating ASCVD risk, mainly using ASCVD Risk Estimator Plus (48 %) or SCORE/SCORE2 (26 %). ESC/EAS guidelines were followed by 55 % and AHA/ACC by 52 %. Treatment thresholds varied: 68 % initiated LDL-C lowering at ≥3.0 mmol/L (≥116 mg/dL) in low-risk primary prevention, while 60 % targeted <1.4 mmol/L (<55 mg/dL) in coronary artery disease. Non-HDL-C targets were less frequently applied. Statins predominated (atorvastatin 58 %, rosuvastatin 40 %), but access to advanced agents was uneven: intercountry ranges of PCSK9 inhibitors (7-84 %), inclisiran (0-72 %), and bempedoic acid (0-73 %). Triglyceride therapy was usually initiated at >1.7 mmol/L (>150 mg/dL), mainly with fibrates (71 %). Cardiologists and lipidologists pursued lower LDL-C levels, whereas general physicians were more conservative. Guideline use varied regionally, with ESC guidance dominant in Poland, US guidance in China, Kenya, and the UAE, and national guidelines in Malaysia. Conclusion: Physicians support risk assessment and statin use, yet wide variation exists in lipid thresholds, non-HDL-C assessment, and access to novel therapies. Despite ESC/EAS and AHA/ACC guidelines uptake, LDL-C targets were often above recommendations, and treatment was predominantly monotherapy. Closing practice gaps requires guideline-aligned tools, stepwise LDL-C lowering, and improved access, particularly in low- and middle-income settings. Lay summary: Managing lipids and assessing risk are key to preventing disease of the heart and blood vessels caused by blockages (ASCVD).In this study, doctors from seven countries reported wide differences in how they check heart disease risk, set cholesterol goals, and use treatments.Most rely on statins, but many start therapy later than guidelines recommend and have uneven access to newer cholesterol-lowering medicines.Clearer guidance, better education, and improved access to therapies are needed to strengthen prevention worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.