ArticleAmerican journal of preventive cardiology2026
Sex differences in the association between cumulative social risk and life's essential 8 cardiovascular health scores in U.S. adults.
Article in American journal of preventive cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Changes in statin therapy eligibility under the 2026 versus 2018 dyslipidemia guidelines.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Neighborhood disadvantage and cardiovascular health in early adolescents in the United States.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Sex-based disparities in cardiovascular disease: Can polysocial screening mitigate the risk?American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cardiovascular health (CVH) disparities persist in the U.S., often shaped by social risk factors. However, few studies have examined how individual and cumulative social risks relate to CVH across sex. Methods: We analyzed cross-sectional data from the 2013-2023 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). CVH was defined by Life's Essential 8 (LE8) which includes diet, physical activity, nicotine exposure, sleep, body mass index, blood lipids, blood glucose, and blood pressure. LE8 scores range from 0 to 100 and were categorized as low (<50), moderate (50-79), or high (≥80). Social risk was defined across six domains: low income, low education, minoritized race or ethnicity, single-living status, lack of health insurance, and unemployment, summed and categorized as 0, 1, 2, 3, or ≥4 risks. Weighted multinomial logistic regression models adjusted for age were used to estimate associations. Results: Among 21,625 adults (representing ≈245 million U.S. adults), the mean age was 46.4 years. Low education was associated with 2.34 times higher odds of low CVH in males (95% CI: 1.72-3.20) and 1.83 times higher odds in females (95% CI: 1.38-2.43). Low income was linked to 2.79 times higher odds of low CVH in females (95% CI: 2.08-3.75). Unemployment was associated with 2.56 times higher odds of low CVH in males (95% CI: 1.91-3.44). Adults with ≥4 social risks had 7.14 times higher odds of low CVH in females and 6.05 in males. Mean LE8 scores declined from 68.0 to 60.9 in females and from 67.2 to 60.3 in males over the decade. Conclusion: Individual and cumulative social risks were strongly associated with lower CVH, with women bearing a greater burden. These findings highlight the need for policies that address social factors to reduce sex-based disparities and improve CVH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.