ArticleAmerican journal of preventive cardiology2026
Estimating the indirect economic burden of elevated lipoprotein(a): A 5-year simulation of cardiovascular events and associated patient and caregiver costs.
Article in American journal of preventive cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) is an independent, causal, genetic risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Data show that a substantial economic burden is imposed by ASCVD; however, there is a paucity of studies evaluating the economic burden of ASCVD events associated with elevated Lp(a). This study estimated the indirect economic burden of elevated Lp(a) in the primary prevention setting. Methods: A Markov model simulated ASCVD events (myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death) and associated indirect costs (patient and caregiver) across Lp(a) groups (<60 nmol/L, ≥60-<105 nmol/L, ≥105-<150 nmol/L, ≥150-<190 nmol/L, and ≥190 nmol/L) over 5 years. Results: Compared with the Lp(a) <60 nmol/L group, the Lp(a) ≥150 nmol/L group in the model had an estimated 42.4% higher indirect costs, representing an estimated incremental indirect cost of $253 million over 5 years or $506 per person per year. The model, based on predicted ASCVD events, suggested that the majority (68.8%) of incremental indirect costs were patient-related, comprising productivity loss from premature cardiovascular death (37.9%), disability/early retirement (17.3%), acute/post-event productivity loss (9.6%), and foregone leisure time (3.9%). Caregiver costs accounted for 31.2% of estimated incremental indirect costs in the model: unpaid caregiving time (17.3%), caregiver income loss (11.7%), and paid caregiving services (2.2%). Conclusions: This simulation model-based study projected that increasing Lp(a) levels were associated with more ASCVD events and higher indirect costs, primarily driven by patient productivity loss and caregiver burden. These findings suggest that the broader societal impact of elevated Lp(a) extends beyond the healthcare system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.