Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42395034›Full record

ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2026

Revisiting the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act: Practical Applications for the Modern Plastic Surgeon.

Myiah P Quach, Mary Kristine Carbullido, Jasmine N Craig, Peter J Wirth, Ellen C Via, Venkat K Rao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mary Kristine Carbullido
Jasmine N Craig
Ellen C Via
Venkat K Rao

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The protection of sensitive patient information is central to modern healthcare delivery and is legally established through the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). For plastic surgery practices, HIPAA compliance presents unique and increasingly complex challenges regarding clinical photography, public-facing marketing, and digital communication. We conducted a focused review to synthesize essential regulatory principles, common pitfalls, and practical strategies for maintaining compliance when creating or operating a plastic surgery practice. We outline historical developments of HIPAA, foundational Privacy and Security Rule requirements, and considerations specific to photography, metadata, electronic communication, and patient consent. Further, we describe common violations encountered in routine workflows and the associated civil and criminal penalties enforced by the Office for Civil Rights. By providing practical, specialty-specific guidance, this article aims to help plastic surgeons strengthen patient privacy protections without compromising clinical efficiency, thus reinforcing the trust at the core of the patient-provider relationship.

Identifiers

PMID42395034
PMCPMC13326940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.