ArticleNeuroscience of consciousness2026
Perceptual learning without feedback is accompanied with systematic changes in confidence processing.
Article in Neuroscience of consciousness, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perceptual learning can occur without external feedback, raising questions about what internal signals might guide this learning. Here, we test the hypothesis that confidence, namely the observer's subjective sense of decision accuracy, is this internal teaching signal. In the present study, participants performed a visual motion discrimination task across 5 days without feedback. After every two trials, they indicated which decision they were more confident in, using a confidence forced-choice paradigm. In addition, following previous literature, we attempted to manipulate confidence independently of accuracy by varying dot density while holding signal-to-noise ratio constant (overall-strength manipulation), however, this manipulation did not consistently separate confidence from performance. In our study without feedback, we found that some participants improved their performance in the visual task, but other participants failed to become better. Those participants who improved their perceptual thresholds over time ("learners") also exhibited systematic changes in their confidence computations: not only sensory noise decreased, but confidence efficiency declined due to increases in confidence-specific noise. Learners also showed an increased reliance on additional evidence not used in the perceptual decision itself (confidence boost). Non-learners showed no comparable changes. These results suggest that confidence judgments evolve during perceptual learning and may serve as an index of how internal monitoring adapts during feedback-free training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.