Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42394973›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026

Differential recovery of ventricular repolarization and hemodynamics following bupivacaine and ropivacaine intoxication: the impact of lipophilicity on lipid emulsion efficacy.

Lucía Rodríguez-Rodríguez, Julio Orallo-Martínez, Ignacio Fernández-López, Elena Vázquez, Sergio García-Ramos, Oscar Quintela, Begoña Bravo, Sara Alvarez-Zaballos, María José Anadón-Baselga, Matilde Zaballos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lucía Rodríguez-Rodríguez *Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Julio Orallo-Martínez *Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Ignacio Fernández-LópezDepartment of Anesthesiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Elena VázquezHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Sergio García-RamosDepartment of Anesthesiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Oscar QuintelaDepartment of Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain. National Institute of Toxicology and Forensic Science, Madrid, Spain.
Begoña BravoNational Institute of Toxicology and Forensic Science, Madrid, Spain.
Sara Alvarez-ZaballosDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
María José Anadón-BaselgaHead Department of Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain.
Matilde ZaballosDepartment of Anesthesiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) causes significant ventricular repolarization disturbances. While intravenous lipid emulsion (ILE) is the standard treatment, the factors governing the simultaneous recovery of electrical and mechanical functions remain unclear. We evaluated ILE efficacy in reversing repolarization alterations and hemodynamic collapse induced by clinically equipotent doses of bupivacaine and ropivacaine. Methods: Twelve swine were randomized to receive a toxic bolus of bupivacaine (4 mg/kg) or ropivacaine (5 mg/kg). The primary outcome was the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the corrected T-peak to T-end interval (Tp-TeC) during the recovery phase. Secondary outcomes included QTc and mean blood pressure (MBP) AUCs. Analysis was divided into a toxicity induction phase (0-3 min) and a recovery phase (3-25 min) to integrate the magnitude and duration of the alterations. Results: Both anesthetics significantly impaired repolarization, with no differences in total toxic load during the initial phase ( Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate a distinct pharmacological divergence in lipid resuscitation therapy. Bupivacaine's higher lipophilicity (Log D) enhances electrical recovery via a more efficient "lipid shuttle" effect on ion channels, while ropivacaine's lower intrinsic cardiotoxicity allows for a more resilient mechanical recovery. These results suggest that electrical and mechanical rescue are governed by different rules dictated by the anesthetic's physicochemical properties.

Indexed as

bupivacainelipid-emulsionropivacaineswine modelventricular-repolarization

Identifiers

PMID42394973
PMCPMC13322873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.