ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Differential recovery of ventricular repolarization and hemodynamics following bupivacaine and ropivacaine intoxication: the impact of lipophilicity on lipid emulsion efficacy.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) causes significant ventricular repolarization disturbances. While intravenous lipid emulsion (ILE) is the standard treatment, the factors governing the simultaneous recovery of electrical and mechanical functions remain unclear. We evaluated ILE efficacy in reversing repolarization alterations and hemodynamic collapse induced by clinically equipotent doses of bupivacaine and ropivacaine. Methods: Twelve swine were randomized to receive a toxic bolus of bupivacaine (4 mg/kg) or ropivacaine (5 mg/kg). The primary outcome was the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the corrected T-peak to T-end interval (Tp-TeC) during the recovery phase. Secondary outcomes included QTc and mean blood pressure (MBP) AUCs. Analysis was divided into a toxicity induction phase (0-3 min) and a recovery phase (3-25 min) to integrate the magnitude and duration of the alterations. Results: Both anesthetics significantly impaired repolarization, with no differences in total toxic load during the initial phase ( Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate a distinct pharmacological divergence in lipid resuscitation therapy. Bupivacaine's higher lipophilicity (Log D) enhances electrical recovery via a more efficient "lipid shuttle" effect on ion channels, while ropivacaine's lower intrinsic cardiotoxicity allows for a more resilient mechanical recovery. These results suggest that electrical and mechanical rescue are governed by different rules dictated by the anesthetic's physicochemical properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.