SynthesisFrontiers in neurology
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Dizziness associated with central neurological disorders-broadly defined as dizziness or vertigo attributable to central nervous system pathology affecting central vestibular processing-is a clinically challenging and heterogeneous condition with limited treatment options. Methods: Nine international and Korean databases were searched from January 1974 through November 2025. Studies were eligible if they were RCTs enrolling adults aged 18 years or older with cerebrovascular disease, neurodegenerative disease, or central vestibular dysfunction who had dizziness, vertigo, or balance-related symptoms or relevant outcome assessments. Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool and certainty of evidence was rated using the Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. Prespecified subgroup analyses by underlying etiology and intervention type, together with leave-one-out sensitivity analyses, were performed to explore heterogeneity. Results: Nine RCTs ( Conclusion: Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD420251229692, PROSPERO: CRD420251229692.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.