Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42394923›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology

Inequitable access to neurosurgical care in the United States.

Linda Liverani, Nina Dwumfour-Poku, Corinna C Zygourakis, Silvia D Vaca

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Linda Liverani *Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford Health Care, Palo Alto, CA, United States.
Nina Dwumfour-Poku *School of Medicine, UT Southwestern, Dallas, TX, United States.
Corinna C ZygourakisDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford Health Care, Palo Alto, CA, United States.
Silvia D Vaca *Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford Health Care, Palo Alto, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite a national neurosurgeon density of 1.58 per 100,000 (exceeding the WHO minimum threshold of 1 per 100,000), equitable access to neurosurgical care remains uneven in the United States. Approximately 9.8% of the US population lacks adequate access to neurosurgical services. Rural and socioeconomically disadvantaged communities are most affected. This literature review focuses specifically on the intersection of neurosurgical access and the distribution, composition, and pipeline of the US neurosurgical workforce. We conducted a narrative review of peer-reviewed literature from 2015 to 2025 using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Search terms included "neurosurgical workforce," "geographic access," "gender equity," "rural neurosurgery," "telemedicine," and "task sharing." Eighty percent of US counties lack neurosurgeons, and only 2.3% of neurosurgeons practice in nonmetropolitan areas. Unemployment, low educational attainment, and poverty independently predict reduced neurosurgeon availability. Geographic access and workforce diversity overlap. States with the fewest training programs also show the lowest representation of women in neurosurgery. Concurrently, graduating medical students interested in neurosurgery who were female, Black/African-American, or Hispanic were significantly more likely to report intention to practice in underserved areas. Addressing geographic, socioeconomic, and gender disparities simultaneously is essential to ensuring timely access to neurosurgical care for all patients. Telemedicine networks, rural training tracks, and intersectional recruitment strategies offer scalable pathways toward a more equitable workforce.

Indexed as

gender diversitygeographic disparitiesneurosurgery trainingneurosurgical accessrural neurosurgerysocial determinants of healthtelemedicineUnited States

Identifiers

PMID42394923
PMCPMC13322906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.