ArticleBioengineering & translational medicine2026
Effects of multi-electrode electrostatic precipitation during intraperitoneal aerosolized drug delivery: Insights from a large animal model.
Article in Bioengineering & translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intraperitoneal aerosolized drug delivery (IPADD) has emerged as a promising local treatment approach for peritoneal metastasis (PM). However, its effectiveness is currently limited by uneven aerosol distribution and restricted tumor tissue penetration. The use of electrostatic precipitation (ESP) exerts an electric force, which may enhance aerosol distribution and tissue penetration. A methylene blue (MB) solution was delivered intraperitoneally as an aerosol during laparoscopy in female pigs. Animals were randomized to receive either IPADD alone or IPADD combined with ESP. Tissue samples were taken from the ventral and lateral abdominal wall and from the small bowel. Aerosol distribution was evaluated using semiquantitative scoring of MB staining. Tissue penetration was measured on cryosections. Systemic resorption was assessed via serial blood sampling. Compared to IPADD alone, ESP clearly improved MB distribution, specifically in regions away from the nebulizer, and appreciably enhanced the tissue penetration in abdominal wall and small bowel samples. Sequenced activation of the three electrodes produced the most pronounced effects. ESP did not increase systemic exposure, and no tissue damage was observed. In this large animal model, multi-electrode ESP safely enhanced aerosol distribution and tissue penetration during IPADD, showing potential to improve treatment in patients with PM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.