ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2026
Role of pharmacists in providing information on cancer genome medicine and patient decision making: Open-label randomized controlled study.
Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer genome medicine grounded in genetic alterations is advancing worldwide, with comprehensive genome profiling (CGP) now routinely implemented in Japan. Although the role of pharmacists in cancer genome medicine remains unclear, they may serve as trusted sources of CGP-related information, potentially enhancing patient health literacy and supporting informed decision making. This study evaluated whether pharmacists providing CGP information earlier than the completion of standard therapy affects patient decision making. Using treatment intent as a stratification factor, participants were randomly allocated 1:1 to nonintervention or intervention groups, in which pharmacists delivered only standard medication counseling as in usual practice or additionally provided structured information regarding CGP, respectively. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients demonstrating reduced Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) scores before and after pharmacist interviews, 2-6 weeks follow-up interval. Secondary endpoint analysis explored factors associated with patient decision making. Data from 180 patients were included in the final analysis. The proportion of patients with decreased DCS scores did not differ significantly between the intervention and non-intervention groups (49.4% vs. 41.9%;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.