ArticleiGIE : innovation, investigation and insights2026
Artificial intelligence for pancreatic cyst dysplasia grading: a multicenter endoscopic ultrasound study.
Article in iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are increasingly detected because of the widespread use of imaging techniques. Among them, mucinous PCLs carry a higher malignancy risk, with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) being the most frequent subtype. Accurate stratification based on the degree of dysplasia-low-grade dysplasia (LGD) versus high-grade dysplasia or carcinoma (HGD/C)-is essential to guide clinical management and avoid unnecessary surgical interventions. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a deep learning model for stratifying IPMNs into HGD/C and LGD using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) images. Methods: This multicenter study included EUS images collected from 5 centers across Spain, Brazil, and the United States. Ground truth classification of IPMNs was established through cytologic and biochemical analysis of cyst fluid, EUS-guided through-the-needle biopsy, or surgical specimens. A deep learning model was trained to distinguish LGD from HGD/C. Model performance was assessed on the basis of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the precision-recall curve. Results: A total of 51,046 EUS images were extracted from 30 examinations performed at 5 centers in Portugal, Spain, Brazil, and the United States. The model distinguished IPMNs with HGD/C from those with LGD with a sensitivity of 95.7%, a specificity of 88.7%, and an overall accuracy of 87.2%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.951. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is one of the first studies to evaluate the potential of an artificial intelligence model for dysplasia grading of IPMNs. Prospective validation of our model is necessary to ensure clinical benefit.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.