Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42394883›Full record

ArticleiGIE : innovation, investigation and insights2026

Artificial intelligence for pancreatic cyst dysplasia grading: a multicenter endoscopic ultrasound study.

Miguel Mascarenhas Saraiva, Joana Mota, Belén Agudo, Francisco Mendes, Jessica Widmer, Tiago Ribeiro, António Pinto da Costa, Miguel Martins, Maria João Almeida, Daniel de la Iglesia and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Miguel Mascarenhas SaraivaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal.
Joana MotaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal.
Belén AgudoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
Francisco MendesDepartment of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal.
Jessica WidmerDivision of Gastroenterology, New York University Langone Health, Long Island, New York, USA.
Tiago RibeiroDepartment of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal.
António Pinto da CostaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
Miguel MartinsDepartment of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal.
Maria João AlmeidaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal.
Daniel de la IglesiaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
Carlos EstebanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
Ana Garcia de ParedesDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Maria MorisDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Cantabria, Spain.
Mateus F de CarvalhoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Service, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcos LeraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Service, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
João FerreiraDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Filipe Vilas-BoasDepartment of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal.
Pedro Moutinho-RibeiroDepartment of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal.
Susana LopesDepartment of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal.
Mariano Gonzalez-HabaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
Eduardo G De MouraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Service, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Guilherme MacedoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are increasingly detected because of the widespread use of imaging techniques. Among them, mucinous PCLs carry a higher malignancy risk, with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) being the most frequent subtype. Accurate stratification based on the degree of dysplasia-low-grade dysplasia (LGD) versus high-grade dysplasia or carcinoma (HGD/C)-is essential to guide clinical management and avoid unnecessary surgical interventions. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a deep learning model for stratifying IPMNs into HGD/C and LGD using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) images. Methods: This multicenter study included EUS images collected from 5 centers across Spain, Brazil, and the United States. Ground truth classification of IPMNs was established through cytologic and biochemical analysis of cyst fluid, EUS-guided through-the-needle biopsy, or surgical specimens. A deep learning model was trained to distinguish LGD from HGD/C. Model performance was assessed on the basis of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the precision-recall curve. Results: A total of 51,046 EUS images were extracted from 30 examinations performed at 5 centers in Portugal, Spain, Brazil, and the United States. The model distinguished IPMNs with HGD/C from those with LGD with a sensitivity of 95.7%, a specificity of 88.7%, and an overall accuracy of 87.2%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.951. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is one of the first studies to evaluate the potential of an artificial intelligence model for dysplasia grading of IPMNs. Prospective validation of our model is necessary to ensure clinical benefit.

Identifiers

PMID42394883
PMCPMC13324231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.