Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42394837›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026

Effects of different dual-task trainings on gait and cortical activation during obstacle crossing in stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Xianglin Wan, Zihao Zhu, Feng Xu, Qiujie Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xianglin WanSchool of Sport Science, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.
Zihao ZhuSchool of Sport Science, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.
Feng XuDepartment of Rehabilitation, People's Hospital of Queshan, Zhumadian, China.
Qiujie LiKey Laboratory for Performance Training & Recovery of General Administration of Sport of China, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: After stroke, patients often exhibit abnormal gait and cortical activation patterns during obstacle crossing, which heightens their risk of falls. This study aimed to examine the effects of Motor dual-task gait training (MDTG) and cognitive dual-task gait training (CDTG) on gait and cortical activation during obstacle crossing in stroke patients, to clarify their differential effects and underlying neural mechanisms. Methods: 35 stroke patients were recruited and randomly assigned to either the MDTG group ( Results: Following training, both groups demonstrated significant improvements in stride length, step length, step width, gait speed, toe-obstacle clearance of the leading and trailing limb, toe-obstacle distance of the trailing limb, anteroposterior and mediolateral COM displacement, mediolateral COM mean velocity, anteroposterior COM-COP distance, hip flexion angle of the leading limb, knee flexion angle of the trailing limb, and peak hip flexion moment of the trailing limb ( Conclusion: A 4-week program of either MDTG or CDTG effectively improved postural stability, enhanced control of the swing limb and COM, and increased efficiency in cortical resource utilization during obstacle crossing in stroke patients. However, no differences in these effects were observed between the two training modalities. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=200755, identifier ChiCTR2300077304.

Indexed as

cerebral cortexdual-task trainingfunctional near-infrared spectroscopygaitstroke rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID42394837
PMCPMC13322844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.