Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42394766›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2026

Infant feeding decisions among people living with human immunodeficiency virus in the United States: a pilot study.

Laura Cox, Sarah A Gutin, Ifeyinwa V Asiodu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laura CoxDepartment of Family Health Care Nursing, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Sarah A GutinDepartment of Community Health Systems, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Ifeyinwa V AsioduDepartment of Family Health Care Nursing, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States.

Funding

Couples Advancing Together for Safer Conception (CAT-SC): A couples’-based intervention to improve engagement in sexual and reproductive health services for mobile fisherfolk in KenyaK01MH132435 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Sarah A Gutin · 2023 to 2026
$721k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH132435
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The benefits of breastfeeding for the lactating person and infant have been well established; however, for those living with HIV, the option to provide human milk has been contraindicated. In January 2023, the US national guidance was revised so breastfeeding can be supported through a shared decision-making process for virally suppressed individuals living with HIV. Few research studies have explored maternal experiences related to infant feeding decisions among people living with HIV (PWH) in the US. Methods: A qualitative, modified critical ethnographic method was used to conduct in-depth interviews with pregnant, postpartum, or parenting persons currently living with HIV in the US. Semi-structured interviews were completed between October 2023 and March 2024. Analyses consisted of a grounded theory technique and thematic analysis. Results: A total of ten pregnant ( Discussion: Multiple factors influence the infant feeding decisions of PWH in the US. Due to these factors, there is a need for an informed, free-choice model that prioritizes unbiased information and situates feeding decisions in the hands of PWH. Further research is needed to ensure PWH are fully supported in their infant feeding decisions.

Indexed as

breastfeedingformula feedingHIVinfant feedingpostpartumpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID42394766
PMCPMC13323233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.