Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42394753›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2026

Individual curiosity modulates exploration in sequential book selection.

Xuanjun Gong, Erie Boorman, Cuihua Shen, Richard Huskey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xuanjun GongDepartment of Communication & Journalism, Texas A&M University, 456 Ross St, College Station, TX 77843, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9642-8885
Erie BoormanDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, 1285 Franz Hall, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Cuihua ShenDepartment of Communication, University of California, Davis, 469 Kerr Hall, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1645-8211
Richard HuskeyDepartment of Communication, University of California, Davis, 469 Kerr Hall, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4559-2439

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Information seeking is widely understood as a curiosity-driven exploration behavior similar to resource foraging. However, it remains unclear whether specific exploration decision mechanisms, such as reward generalization and directed exploration, extend beyond physical consumption domains to the semantic spaces of knowledge and information. How do people choose what to read when navigating vast and unfamiliar content landscapes? We study sequential book selection to investigate this question. At times, readers exploit familiar books they expect to enjoy; at other times, they explore novel options to discover potential rewards. Using a large-scale real-world dataset and a controlled behavioral experiment, we show that book selection is guided by structured generalization across a semantic embedding space and by directed exploration toward options with high uncertainty. Moreover, individual differences in curiosity modulate this exploration-exploitation tradeoff, promoting exploratory reading and increasing enjoyment. These findings demonstrate that core computational mechanisms underlying foraging generalize to epistemic domains and shape real-world media selection.

Indexed as

curiosityexplorationinformation seekingmedia selection

Identifiers

PMID42394753
PMCPMC13326943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.