ArticlePNAS nexus2026
Individual curiosity modulates exploration in sequential book selection.
Article in PNAS nexus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Information seeking is widely understood as a curiosity-driven exploration behavior similar to resource foraging. However, it remains unclear whether specific exploration decision mechanisms, such as reward generalization and directed exploration, extend beyond physical consumption domains to the semantic spaces of knowledge and information. How do people choose what to read when navigating vast and unfamiliar content landscapes? We study sequential book selection to investigate this question. At times, readers exploit familiar books they expect to enjoy; at other times, they explore novel options to discover potential rewards. Using a large-scale real-world dataset and a controlled behavioral experiment, we show that book selection is guided by structured generalization across a semantic embedding space and by directed exploration toward options with high uncertainty. Moreover, individual differences in curiosity modulate this exploration-exploitation tradeoff, promoting exploratory reading and increasing enjoyment. These findings demonstrate that core computational mechanisms underlying foraging generalize to epistemic domains and shape real-world media selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.