ReviewFrontiers in oral health2026
The use of ozone in oral health care: a narrative review of current evidence and clinical applications.
Review in Frontiers in oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ozone therapy, a clinical application of various ozone forms that is used for its antiseptic techniques, has sparked interest in recent years over its unique antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties in the body. Moreover, its ability to work as an antiseptic while avoiding antimicrobial resistance has sparked interest in the dental field as no other antiseptic agent is able to do so. As a triatomic molecule of oxygen (O₃), ozone functions through oxidative mechanisms that disrupt microbial cell walls, inhibit biofilm formation, and modulate host immune responses without contributing to antimicrobial resistance. Types of study reviewed: Peer-reviewed articles published in English, including systematic reviews, meta-analyses, observational studies, narrative reviews, case series, and case reports were included in the article. Results: This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on the mechanisms of ozone as well as the therapeutic efficacy of ozone in clinical applications across multiple dental specialties. Three main delivery modalities (gaseous ozone, ozonated water, and ozonated oils) demonstrate diverse clinical benefits and are discussed in the review. Practical implications: Comparative studies indicate that for some dental applications ozone achieves antimicrobial efficacy comparable to conventional agents such as chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) while exhibiting reduced cytotoxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.