Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42394730›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oral health2026

The use of ozone in oral health care: a narrative review of current evidence and clinical applications.

Catherine Jauregui, Gary Chike, Shawyun Khoshneviszadeh, Daniya Killedar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Catherine JaureguiDental College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, United States.
Gary ChikeDental College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, United States.
Shawyun KhoshneviszadehDental College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, United States.
Daniya KilledarDental College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ozone therapy, a clinical application of various ozone forms that is used for its antiseptic techniques, has sparked interest in recent years over its unique antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties in the body. Moreover, its ability to work as an antiseptic while avoiding antimicrobial resistance has sparked interest in the dental field as no other antiseptic agent is able to do so. As a triatomic molecule of oxygen (O₃), ozone functions through oxidative mechanisms that disrupt microbial cell walls, inhibit biofilm formation, and modulate host immune responses without contributing to antimicrobial resistance. Types of study reviewed: Peer-reviewed articles published in English, including systematic reviews, meta-analyses, observational studies, narrative reviews, case series, and case reports were included in the article. Results: This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on the mechanisms of ozone as well as the therapeutic efficacy of ozone in clinical applications across multiple dental specialties. Three main delivery modalities (gaseous ozone, ozonated water, and ozonated oils) demonstrate diverse clinical benefits and are discussed in the review. Practical implications: Comparative studies indicate that for some dental applications ozone achieves antimicrobial efficacy comparable to conventional agents such as chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) while exhibiting reduced cytotoxicity.

Indexed as

antimicrobialgaseous ozoneozonated oilsozonated waterozone therapy

Identifiers

PMID42394730
PMCPMC13322869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.