ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Trastuzumab emtansine versus trastuzumab plus pertuzumab for HER2-positive breast cancer with residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy: a real-world study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of T-DM1 versus trastuzumab plus pertuzumab in adjuvant treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer patients with residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant therapy. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 184 patients treated at Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University from January 2019 to January 2022. The patients were divided into a T-DM1 treatment group and a dual-target treatment group based on whether they received T-DM1 or trastuzumab plus pertuzumab during adjuvant therapy. Clinical and pathological data of the two groups were collected before and after surgery, and follow-up was conducted. The primary study endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). Results: Disease progression occurred in 20.3% of the dual-target treatment group and 12.6% of the T-DM1 treatment group. Although T-DM1 was associated with a 38% reduction in recurrence risk, the difference was not statistically significant (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.30-1.26, P = 0.19). Exploratory subgroup analyses suggested improved DFS with T-DM1 in patients with initially unresectable disease, preoperative lymph node positivity, or poor pathological response (MP 1-3 or RCB III); In terms of safety, both groups of patients were consistent with the known safety profile. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia was significantly more frequent with T-DM1 (8.45% vs 0.88%, P = 0.01), representing a clinically important toxicity trade-off. Conclusion: The use of T-DM1 in the adjuvant setting suggests improved disease-free survival in HER2-positive non-pCR patients who were initially inoperable, had preoperative lymph node positivity, or exhibited poor pathological response (MP grade 1-3 or RCB III).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.