ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Automated transperineal ultrasound analysis using deep learning for pelvic floor dysfunction assessment after total hysterectomy.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) is a common functional disorder following total hysterectomy. Currently, the assessment mainly relies on manual measurements of transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) images, which suffers from low efficiency, subjectivity, and limited reproducibility. Objective: To address these limitations, this work proposes an automated transperineal ultrasound analysis using deep learning for pelvic floor dysfunction assessment after total hysterectomy. Methods: A labeled dataset including key anatomical landmarks such as the symphysis pubis, bladder neck, urethra, and puborectalis muscle was established, and a multi-scale shifted window Transformer was developed to achieve automatic segmentation and key point detection. Additionally, a geometric reasoning module was further designed to compute seven clinically relevant functional parameters, including bladder neck-symphysis distance, posterior urethrovesical angle, and urethral rotation angle. Results: Experimental results demonstrated that the model achieved an average Dice coefficient of 88.67 ± 1.96% in segmentation, with key point localization errors controlled within 2 mm. The automatic measurement results are highly consistent with manual annotations, with Pearson correlation coefficients up to 0.92, and effectively distinguished functional differences among patients undergoing different surgical approaches. Conclusion: The proposed method enables structured, automated, and objective TPUS image analysis, significantly reducing manual intervention. Although validated in patients with benign diseases, the approach is directly transferable to gynecologic oncology patients, who are at even higher risk of PFD due to more extensive surgery and adjuvant therapies. It provides a reliable tool for postoperative functional monitoring and therapeutic evaluation after total hysterectomy, and holds great potential for functional imaging-based rehabilitation assessment in post-hysterectomy patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.