ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
A condition-aware retrieval-augmented decision support framework for tomato cultivation management.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tomato cultivation management requires decisions that depend on growth stage, environment, and production scenarios. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) can ground large language model (LLM) outputs in external knowledge, but conventional retrieval often ignores such conditional constraints, leading to evidence that is topically relevant yet condition-inapplicable. This study develops TSCA-RAG, a condition-aware RAG framework for tomato cultivation question answering. TSCA-RAG extracts temporal, environmental, and contextual conditions from user queries using a structured label set and employs TSCAF-Retrieval, which combines semantic retrieval, BM25 keyword retrieval, and metadata-based condition retrieval through adaptive fusion and a cross-strategy consistency reward. A tomato cultivation knowledge base was constructed as fine-grained knowledge units with condition annotations and used to evaluate both retrieval and end-to-end generation. Retrieval performance was assessed using Recall@K, MRR, and NDCG@5, and answer quality was evaluated using similarity-based and rubric-based metrics under matched generation settings. On retrieval benchmarks, TSCA-RAG improves over Fine-tuned BGE-M3 with relative gains of 5.70% in Recall@1, 4.31% in Recall@5, and 4.76% in NDCG@5. In end-to-end evaluation, TSCA-RAG achieves higher Faithfulness, Correctness, and Utility, with an 11.29% increase in Utility compared with the strongest baseline RAG system. The condition extraction module attains an overall F1 of 81.8%, and a built-in confidence attenuation mechanism recovers approximately 53% of performance loss from single-dimension extraction errors. These results indicate that explicitly modeling cultivation conditions, combined with robust extraction and adaptive error mitigation, can improve evidence applicability and response usefulness for AI-assisted tomato cultivation decision support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.