ArticleCybersecurity2026
A socio-technical framework for cyber-resilience in hybrid oil-renewable energy grids.
Article in Cybersecurity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Combining traditional oil infrastructure with distributed renewable energy resources (DERs), including critical grid-edge assets like electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure that link transportation and power systems, has created hybrid energy systems that are more connected and digitally complex. These systems integrate legacy operational technologies (OT), such as SCADA, with decentralized, IoT-enabled assets that often rely on cloud-based analytics and remote connectivity. This conjunction introduces cybersecurity risks by linking historically isolated OT environments to modern, internet-exposed components, creating more entry points, inconsistent security baselines, and new attack surfaces. The resulting vulnerabilities extend beyond traditional IT-centric threat models. Conventional cybersecurity strategies, which prioritize technical controls in isolation, often fail to address systemic risks stemming from institutional fragmentation, regulatory gaps, and third-party dependencies. This study introduces a Socio-Technical Resilience Framework grounded in the Systems-Theoretic Accident Model and Processes (STAMP) and Socio-Technical Systems (STS) theory to access and mitigate cyber risks in hybrid grids. Through comparative case studies of the Colonial Pipeline ransomware event and cyber disruptions in European DER infrastructure, the paper finds that fragmented coordination, isolated threat intelligence, and weak human-system integration significantly amplify cyber impacts that undermine static, perimeter-based defense models. The study contributes a layered framework for cyber resilience that operates across three domains: (1) technical (via zero-trust architecture and distributed anomaly detection), (2) organizational (through shared situational awareness and cognitive decision-support tools), and (3) governance (by leveraging federated threat intelligence and regulatory harmonization). This multi-domain approach enhances both operational flexibility and long-term sustainability. Ultimately, the paper demonstrates that enduring cyber resilience in hybrid energy systems requires more than patching vulnerabilities. It demands a systemic rethinking of control, coordination, and design. The framework and findings offer a forward-looking roadmap for securing the energy sector against evolving threats in an era of distributed complexity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.