ReviewCirculation. Genomic and precision medicine2026
Unlocking the Regulatory Genome: Interpreting the Clinical Impact of Noncoding Variants in Genetic Cardiomyopathies.
Review in Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical genetic testing is now the standard of care for cardiomyopathy, guiding risk stratification, clinical management, and earlier diagnosis in family members. Yet, a large proportion of the genetic basis of cardiomyopathy remains incompletely explained. Prior efforts to identify genetic causes of cardiomyopathy have largely focused on coding DNA sequence, which accounts for only 3% of the human genome, leaving the noncoding regulatory sequence space relatively unexplored. A confluence of emerging technologies is now transforming our capability to identify and interpret noncoding variants. This review summarizes the field's current knowledge of how noncoding variants influence the development of cardiomyopathy, both from the standpoint of rare Mendelian disease variants and population-level risk alleles. In addition, we describe how new technologies have enabled systematic identification and prioritization of regulatory regions that govern gene expression. Beyond identification of regulatory regions, we discuss how causal testing of variants is now possible at an unprecedented scale through massively parallel reporter assays, allowing both detailed mapping of these regions and efficient validation of variants discovered through genome-wide association studies. Finally, we review deep learning approaches that hold the potential for genome-wide noncoding variant interpretation. Together, this review highlights strategies for large-scale interpretation of noncoding variants while also demonstrating the clear need for extension of clinical variant adjudication workflows to the noncoding genome to fully take advantage of increasingly available whole-genome sequencing data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.