ArticleSexual and reproductive health matters2025
From reproductive violence to empowerment: reconquering power in assisted reproduction - a qualitative study.
Article in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
People who use medically assisted reproduction (MAR) outside the legal and/or medical framework are generally on the margins of the dominant procreative norm, making them particularly vulnerable to a wide range of reproductive violence such as legal restriction to medical care, discrimination or mistreatment. The aim of this study was to explore experiences of reproductive violence among people living in France who sought MAR either abroad or without medical assistance. Semi-structured interviews were conducted between 2022 and 2023. Almost half of the interviewees (n = 28/69) had been confronted with reproductive violence during their MAR journey. Although the French bioethics law extended access to MAR to single women and female same-sex couples in 2021, participants described how the shortage of gametes fuelled all forms of reproductive violence, encompassing psychological, economic and physical violence. Our findings revealed an intersectional dimension to these experiences, particularly affecting individuals with non-heterosexual identities, older age or higher body weight. Single women appeared particularly exposed to such violence. However, faced with reproductive violence, many participants demonstrated resilience and empowerment, notably through support from social networks and associations. This solidarity helped them to develop strategies of resistance and avoidance. From personal difficulties and experiences of violence at the institutional level and in care, people moved on to awareness of systemic violence, encouraging them to support their peers. Awareness led them to denounce reproductive injustice and even to demand changes in MAR organisation and care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.