Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42394485›Full record

ArticleZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences2026

[Analysis of cardiovascular adverse events associated with 8 immune checkpoint inhibitors based on the FAERS database].

Linlu Huang, Caihong Qu, Wei Dai, Jun Peng, Xiaoying Wang

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Linlu HuangOffice of Pharmacovigilance, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630. 237211063@csu.edu.cn.
Caihong QuOffice of Pharmacovigilance, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630. quch@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Wei DaiOffice of Pharmacovigilance, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630.
Jun PengDepartment of Pharmacology, Xiangya School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha 410013.
Xiaoying WangInformation Center, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used in cancer therapy; however, systematic epidemiological studies of ICI-associated cardiovascular adverse events in China remain limited. This study aims to analyze cardiovascular adverse event signals associated with ICIs approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), thereby providing evidence to support safer clinical use.

methodsData were obtained from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from the first quarter of 2011 to the fourth quarter of 2024 (56 quarters over 14 years). Adverse event reports were screened using "primary suspected drugs" as the inclusion criterion. Eight ICIs were included: atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, cemiplimab, ipilimumab, and tremelimumab. Adverse events were first classified according to system organ class (SOC), and reports involving cardiac and vascular disorders were extracted. Signal detection was subsequently performed at both the standardized MedDRA query (SMQ) level and preferred terms (PT) level. The Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN) method was applied to calculate the information component (

resultsA total of 12 890 cardiac adverse event reports and 8 543 vascular adverse event reports were identified. Among all cardiovascular adverse event reports, the top three drugs were nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and atezolizumab. Male patients accounted for a higher proportion than female patients, and patients aged over 65 years represented more than 50.00% of reports. From 2011 to 2024, the number of cardiovascular adverse event reports associated with the 8 ICIs showed a rapid upward trend. The proportions of fatal outcomes were 30.74% for cardiac adverse events and 20.83% for vascular adverse events. At the SMQ level, positive cardiac adverse event signals involved 6 SMQ codes, whereas positive vascular adverse events signals involved 8 SMQ codes. Non-infectious myocarditis/pericarditis was the only strong positive signal shared by all 8 ICIs, followed by thrombophlebitis, vasculitis, and cardiac arrhythmias. At the PT level, 47 positive cardiac adverse event signals and 36 positive vascular adverse event signals were detected. Strong positive cardiovascular adverse event signals included myocarditis, immune-mediated myocarditis, autoimmune myocarditis, pericardial effusion, cardiac tamponade, malignant pericarditis, embolism, and thrombophlebitis migrans, etc.

conclusionsCardiovascular adverse events associated with ICIs in the FAERS database commonly include myocarditis, pericarditis, arrhythmias, and vasculitis, with relatively high proportions of severe outcomes and mortality. Therefore, pre-treatment risk screening, close monitoring during therapy, and multidisciplinary management of cardiovascular adverse events are essential to ensure patient safety.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsCardiovascular DiseasesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasmsUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsBayesian confidence propagation neural networkcardiovascular adverse eventsFood and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting Systemimmune checkpoint inhibitorsinformation component

Identifiers

PMID42394485
PMCPMC13305682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.